12. FEJEZET | HIVATKOZÁSOK

  1. Srivastava A, Giangrande P, Poon MC, Chua M, McCraw A, Wiedel J. Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia. Montreal, QC, Canada: World Federation of Hemophilia; 2005.
  2. Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia. Montreal, QC, Canada: World Federation of Hemophilia; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2516.2012.02909.x. Accessed January 8, 2020.
  3. Lewis SZ, Diekemper R, Ornelas J, Casey KR. Methodologies for the development of CHEST guidelines and expert panel reports. Chest. 2014;146(1):182-192.
  4. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2011. https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK209539.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2020.
  5. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525-531.
  6. WHO Human Genetics Programme. Delivery of treatment for haemophilia: report of a Joint WHO/WFH/ISTH Meeting, London, United Kingdom, 11-13 February 2002. World Health Organization. London, United Kingdom: World Health Organization, 2002. https://apps. who.int/iris/handle/10665/67792. Accessed February 28, 2020.
  7. Neumann I, Schunemann HJ. Guideline groups should make recommendations even if the evidence is considered insufficient. CMAJ. 2020;192(2):E23-E24.
  8. Whitman NI. The Delphi technique as an alternative for committee meetings. J Nurs Educ. 1990;29(8):377-379.
  9. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1-8.
  10. Kwong JS, Chen H, Sun X. Development of evidence-based recommendations: implications for preparing expert consensus statements. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(24):2998-3000.
  11. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. A m J Public Health. 1984;74(9):979- 983.
  12. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt G. Evidence vs Consensus in Clinical Practice Guidelines. JAMA. 2019;322(8):725-726.
  13. Miller R, Chrissian A. American Association for Bronchoscopy and Interventional Pulmonology. Personal communication. 2019.
  14. Diekemper RL, Patel S, Mette SA, Ornelas J, Ouellette DR, Casey KR. Making the GRADE: CHEST updates its methodology. Chest. 2018;153(3):756-759.
  15. Califf RM. A beginning to principles of ethical and regulatory oversight of patient-centered research. A nn Intern Med. 2018;169(8):579- 580.
  16. Detterbeck FC, Gould MK, Lewis SZ, Patel S. Extending the reach of evidence-based medicine: a proposed categorization of lower-level evidence. Chest. 2018;153(2):498-506.

TOVÁBBI INFORMÁCIÓ

További kiegészítő információk találhatóak online a További információk részben.

Hogyan kell hivatkozni ezt a cikket?
Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia.
2020:00:1-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14046